Educational inequalities in patient-centred care: patients' preferences and experiences
© Rademakers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 January 2012
Accepted: 3 August 2012
Published: 17 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jany Rademakers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laurann Yen|
|31 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janice Gullick|
|19 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Fethney|
|21 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jany Rademakers|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laurann Yen|
|7 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Fethney|
|17 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jany Rademakers|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-261|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.