Improving access to psychosocial interventions for common mental health problems in the United Kingdom: narrative review and development of a conceptual model for complex interventions
© Gask et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 January 2011
Accepted: 25 June 2012
Published: 13 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jan 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Bower|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoff Wong|
|14 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Bower|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoff Wong|
|17 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Bower|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-249|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.