Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study

  • Caroline Sanders1Email author,
  • Anne Rogers1,
  • Robert Bowen1,
  • Peter Bower1,
  • Shashivadan Hirani2,
  • Martin Cartwright2,
  • Ray Fitzpatrick3,
  • Martin Knapp4,
  • James Barlow5,
  • Jane Hendy6,
  • Theti Chrysanthaki5,
  • Martin Bardsley7 and
  • Stanton P Newman8
BMC Health Services Research201212:220

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220

Received: 2 April 2012

Accepted: 10 July 2012

Published: 26 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - WALTER PALMAS
18 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lance Brendan Young
31 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Caroline Sanders
Resubmission - Version 3
31 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - WALTER PALMAS
13 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lance Brendan Young
17 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Caroline Sanders
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Sciences Research Group (Primary Care), The University of Manchester
(2)
Health Service Research, City University
(3)
Department of Public Health, University of Oxford
(4)
London School of Economics and Political Science
(5)
Imperial College Business School
(6)
Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey
(7)
The Nuffield Trust
(8)
School of Health Sciences, City University

Advertisement