Standardizing admission and discharge processes to improve patient flow: A cross sectional study
- Berta Ortiga†1Email author,
- Albert Salazar†2,
- Albert Jovell3,
- Joan Escarrabill4,
- Guillem Marca5 and
- Xavier Corbella6
© Ortiga et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 October 2011
Accepted: 28 June 2012
Published: 28 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rene Bekker|
|19 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard Silke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard Silke|
|30 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rene Bekker|
|17 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Berta Ortiga|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-180|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.