Acceptability – a neglected dimension of access to health care: findings from a study on childhood convulsions in rural Tanzania
© Dillip et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 May 2011
Accepted: 9 May 2012
Published: 9 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elialilia S. Okello|
|13 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DAUDI SIMBA|
|27 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Angel Dillip|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DAUDI SIMBA|
|12 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Angel Dillip|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Angel Dillip|
|12 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DAUDI SIMBA|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-113|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.