Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems
© Takian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 November 2011
Accepted: 30 April 2012
Published: 30 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Showell|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hardeep Singh|
|2 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amirhossein Takian|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Showell|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hardeep Singh|
|27 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amirhossein Takian|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-105|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.