Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“I know it’s bad for me and yet I do it”: exploring the factors that perpetuate smoking in Aboriginal Health Workers - a qualitative study

  • Anna P Dawson1,
  • Margaret Cargo1,
  • Harold Stewart2,
  • Alwin Chong2 and
  • Mark Daniel1Email author
BMC Health Services Research201212:102

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-102

Received: 12 October 2011

Accepted: 25 April 2012

Published: 25 April 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Guydish
17 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penelope Abbott
8 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penelope Abbott
24 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Guydish
30 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Dawson
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Social Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia
(2)
Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia

Advertisement