Does GP training in depression care affect patient outcome? - A systematic review and meta-analysis
© Sikorski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 June 2011
Accepted: 10 January 2012
Published: 10 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|29 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marijn Alice Prins|
|13 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Claudia Luck-Sikorski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Bower|
|22 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Claudia Luck-Sikorski|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.