Long term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of services for urinary symptoms
© Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 12 May 2010
Accepted: 14 March 2011
Published: 14 March 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 May 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Wagg|
|8 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell|
|7 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Williams|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Mar 2011||Editorially accepted|
|14 Mar 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-58|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.