Beyond 50. challenges at work for older nurses and allied health workers in rural Australia: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions
© Fragar and Depczynski; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 June 2010
Accepted: 21 February 2011
Published: 21 February 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Letvak|
|3 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dorothy Forbes|
|8 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Depczynski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dorothy Forbes|
|29 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Letvak|
|3 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Depczynski|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Depczynski|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Feb 2011||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-42|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.