Perceived unfairness in working conditions: The case of public health services in Tanzania
© Songstad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 July 2010
Accepted: 12 February 2011
Published: 12 February 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Manongi|
|27 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niyi Awofeso|
|8 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Nils Gunnar Songstad|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Manongi|
|13 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niyi Awofeso|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Nils Gunnar Songstad|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Feb 2011||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-34|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.