Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada
© Tony et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 1 October 2010
Accepted: 30 November 2011
Published: 30 November 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janine van Til|
|9 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paule Poulin|
|30 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Hanane Khoury|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paule Poulin|
|28 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Hanane Khoury|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Nov 2011||Editorially accepted|
|30 Nov 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-329|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.