Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records
- Diana C Darcy†1,
- Eleanor T Lewis†2Email author,
- Kelly E Ormond†3,
- David J Clark4 and
- Jodie A Trafton†2
© Darcy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 28 March 2011
Accepted: 2 November 2011
Published: 2 November 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vera Frankova|
|10 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Downing|
|7 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eleanor Lewis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Downing|
|18 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eleanor Lewis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Nov 2011||Editorially accepted|
|2 Nov 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-294|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.