Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure

  • Mary Jo Pugh1, 2Email author,
  • Dan R Berlowitz3, 4,
  • Jaya K Rao5,
  • Gabriel Shapiro4, 6,
  • Ruzan Avetisyan4,
  • Amresh Hanchate7,
  • Kelli Jarrett4,
  • Jeffrey Tabares1 and
  • Lewis E Kazis3, 8
BMC Health Services Research201111:1

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-1

Received: 30 July 2010

Accepted: 3 January 2011

Published: 3 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
7 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - jarlath varley
19 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mary Jo Pugh
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mary Jo Pugh
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
3 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
South Texas Veterans Health Care System, VERDICT REAP
(2)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
(3)
Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research (CHQOER), Veterans Administration Medical Center
(4)
Boston University School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management
(5)
University of North Carolina, Eshelman School of Pharmacy
(6)
Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal
(7)
Boston Veterans Administration Medical Center, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research
(8)
Center for the Assessment of Pharmaceutical Practices (CAPP) and Pharmaceutical Assessment Management and Policy (PAMP), Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health

Advertisement