Uncompensated care provided by for-profit, not-for-profit, and government owned hospitals
© Cram et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 13 October 2009
Accepted: 7 April 2010
Published: 7 April 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan McHugh|
|28 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Lo Sasso|
|22 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Cram|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan McHugh|
|15 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Lo Sasso|
|4 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Cram|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Cram|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|31 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 Apr 2010||Editorially accepted|
|7 Apr 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-90|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.