Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The failure of routine rapid HIV testing: a case study of improving low sensitivity in the field

  • Benjamin J Wolpaw1Email author,
  • Catherine Mathews1, 2,
  • Mickey Chopra3,
  • Diana Hardie4,
  • Virginia de Azevedo5,
  • Karen Jennings5 and
  • Mark N Lurie6
BMC Health Services Research201010:73

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-73

Received: 13 November 2009

Accepted: 22 March 2010

Published: 22 March 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Gray
25 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Dax
26 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Dax
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
22 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-73

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council
(2)
School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Public Health
(3)
School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape
(4)
National Health Laboratory Service and Division of Virology, University of Cape Town
(5)
Cape Town City Health Department, City of Cape Town
(6)
Department of Community Health, Brown University Medical School

Advertisement