Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study

  • Mike Slade1Email author,
  • Victoria Bird1,
  • Ruth Chandler2,
  • Jo Fox3,
  • John Larsen4,
  • Jerry Tew5 and
  • Mary Leamy1
BMC Health Services Research201010:323

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-323

Received: 2 July 2010

Accepted: 2 December 2010

Published: 2 December 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison McDonald
15 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Michie
30 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos
30 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Michie
3 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos
17 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-323

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry
(2)
Service User and Carer Involvement Coordinator in Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
(3)
Department of Social and Social Policy, Anglia Ruskin University
(4)
Rethink
(5)
Institute of Applied Social Studies, University of Birmingham

Advertisement