The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study
© Slade et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 2 July 2010
Accepted: 2 December 2010
Published: 2 December 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison McDonald|
|15 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Michie|
|30 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos|
|30 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Michie|
|3 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos|
|17 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mike Slade|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Dec 2010||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-323|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.