Health plan administrative records versus birth certificate records: quality of race and ethnicity information in children
- Ning Smith†1,
- Rajan L Iyer†1,
- Annette Langer-Gould1,
- Darios T Getahun1,
- Daniel Strickland1,
- Steven J Jacobsen1,
- Wansu Chen1,
- Stephen F Derose1 and
- Corinna Koebnick1Email author
© Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 7 April 2010
Accepted: 23 November 2010
Published: 23 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scarlett Gomez|
|17 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karl Eschbach|
|2 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Corinna Koebnick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scarlett Gomez|
|22 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Corinna Koebnick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-316|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.