Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States

  • Talya Salz1Email author,
  • Morris Weinberger2,
  • John Z Ayanian3,
  • Noel T Brewer4,
  • Craig C Earle5,
  • Jennifer Elston Lafata6,
  • Deborah A Fisher7,
  • Bryan J Weiner8 and
  • Robert S Sandler9
BMC Health Services Research201010:256

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256

Received: 19 March 2010

Accepted: 1 September 2010

Published: 1 September 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Mar 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Adams
13 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Miller
18 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Veitch
23 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - john wright
27 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Talya Salz
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Talya Salz
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Talya Salz
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-256

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
(2)
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(3)
Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School
(4)
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina
(5)
Health Services Research Program, Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
(6)
Center for Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System
(7)
Department of Medicine, Durham VAMC, HSR&D Center of Excellence, Duke University Medical Center
(8)
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(9)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina

Advertisement