Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care

  • Pieter Van Herck1Email author,
  • Delphine De Smedt2,
  • Lieven Annemans2,
  • Roy Remmen3,
  • Meredith B Rosenthal4 and
  • Walter Sermeus1
BMC Health Services Research201010:247

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247

Received: 22 January 2010

Accepted: 23 August 2010

Published: 23 August 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Eijkenaar
3 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sukyung Chung
18 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Frølich
12 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Van Herck
Resubmission - Version 3
12 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Eijkenaar
6 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Van Herck
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Van Herck
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Van Herck
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
23 Aug 2010 Editorially accepted
23 Aug 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
(2)
Department of Public Health, Ghent University
(3)
Department of General Practice, University Antwerp
(4)
Harvard School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management

Advertisement