Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
© Boonstra and Broekhuis; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 3 March 2010
Accepted: 6 August 2010
Published: 6 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Glen Stream|
|13 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine DesRoches|
|2 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Boonstra|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Boonstra|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Boonstra|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|6 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|6 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-231|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.