The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review
© Hutchinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 28 October 2009
Accepted: 16 June 2010
Published: 16 June 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gideon Caplan|
|3 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz|
|4 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Hutchinson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Hutchinson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|1 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Hutchinson|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|1 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|16 Jun 2010||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jun 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-166|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.