Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set 2.0 quality indicators: a systematic review

  • Alison M Hutchinson1Email author,
  • Doris L Milke2,
  • Suzanne Maisey3,
  • Cynthia Johnson4,
  • Janet E Squires5,
  • Gary Teare6 and
  • Carole A Estabrooks5
BMC Health Services Research201010:166

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-166

Received: 28 October 2009

Accepted: 16 June 2010

Published: 16 June 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gideon Caplan
3 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Berlowitz
4 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 4
4 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 6
26 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
1 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Alison Hutchinson
Resubmission - Version 9
1 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
16 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-166

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, and Cabrini-Deakin Centre for Nursing Research, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health
(2)
CapitalCare Edmonton Area and Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Nursing, and Department of Psychology, University of Alberta
(3)
Shepherd's Care Foundation
(4)
Health Professions Strategy and Practice, Alberta Health Services
(5)
Knowledge Utilization Studies Program (KUSP), Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
(6)
Saskatchewan Health Quality Council

Advertisement