Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study

  • Shannon L Sibbald1Email author,
  • Jennifer L Gibson2,
  • Peter A Singer3,
  • Ross Upshur4 and
  • Douglas K Martin5
BMC Health Services Research201010:131

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-131

Received: 14 September 2009

Accepted: 19 May 2010

Published: 19 May 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neale Smith
28 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
3 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Bate
9 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
23 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neale Smith
26 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Bate
31 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
27 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 8
3 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
14 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 12
14 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
19 May 2010 Editorially accepted
19 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-131

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health Studies The University of Western Ontario London
(2)
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics
(3)
McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health, University Health Network and University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine MaRS Centre
(4)
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics & University of Toronto School of Public Health Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
(5)
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics & University of Toronto Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation

Advertisement