Lifting the lid of the "black intervention box" - the systematic development of an action competence programme for people with screen-detected dysglycaemia
© Maindal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 18 December 2009
Accepted: 7 May 2010
Published: 7 May 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martha Funnell|
|1 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Urban Rosenqvist|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Helle Terkildsen Maindal|
|7 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Urban Rosenqvist|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Helle Terkildsen Maindal|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|2 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|7 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-114|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.