Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity: a comparative study of two sources
© Fortin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 27 November 2009
Accepted: 6 May 2010
Published: 6 May 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Nov 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Britt|
|19 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd|
|15 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Fortin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Britt|
|16 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd|
|27 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Fortin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 May 2010||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-111|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.