Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence estimates of multimorbidity: a comparative study of two sources

  • Martin Fortin1Email author,
  • Catherine Hudon1,
  • Jeannie Haggerty2,
  • Marjan van den Akker3 and
  • José Almirall1
BMC Health Services Research201010:111

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-111

Received: 27 November 2009

Accepted: 6 May 2010

Published: 6 May 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helena Britt
19 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd
15 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Fortin
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helena Britt
16 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas O'Dowd
27 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Martin Fortin
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 May 2010 Editorially accepted
6 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-111

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Sherbrooke University
(2)
Department of Community Sciences, Sherbrooke University
(3)
Department of General Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University

Advertisement